iDharma is an independent AI audit company. It reviews the AI systems organizations run and delivers a verified, standards-based report on whether their AI is accurate, fair, secure, and compliant — mapped to the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and ISO/IEC 42001.

What does an iDharma AI audit cover?

An iDharma audit examines four dimensions of a live AI system — accuracy, fairness, security, and compliance — and returns a rating per dimension, evidence-backed findings, and a prioritized remediation roadmap. The scope is agreed and approved with you before any payment.

How is iDharma independent?

iDharma audits AI systems it did not build and holds no stake in the tools it reviews, so its findings are defensible to a board, a customer, or a regulator. An audit is a methodology-backed review — not a certification or a warranty.

Which standards does iDharma audit against?

iDharma maps findings to recognized frameworks including the EU AI Act, the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, ISO/IEC 42001, HIPAA, SOC 2, and India's DPDP Act — so every finding traces to a clause, not an opinion.

How do I request an AI audit?

Tell iDharma about your AI system through the Request an AI Audit form. Scope, timeline, and price are agreed up front, and nothing is charged until you approve the scope.

AI Insights for INSURANCE

AI in Insurance: Underwriting, Pricing & Claims Compliance

AI used in underwriting, risk pricing, and claims decisions is classified as access-to-essential-services AI — one of the highest-risk categories in the EU AI Act. Enforcement is arriving.

High-risk

Insurance AI underwriting and pricing explicitly in EU AI Act Annex III — access to essential services

Directly in scope

Pre-enf.

No headline insurance-AI fine yet — early-mover audit advantage available now

Window is open

Aug 2026

EU AI Act high-risk system obligations take effect — verify current date with EU AI Office

Compliance deadline

Discriminatory pricing, opaque claims denial, and proxy variables in insurance AI are the patterns regulators and plaintiffs are building cases around. Insurers and insurtechs using AI for pricing, underwriting, fraud, or claims decisions are directly in scope. The argument "our vendor handles compliance" has not succeeded in any EU enforcement action we have reviewed.

⭐ Featured Insight

★ Featured STANDARDS EXPLAINED

8 min read

🛡️ Insurance

Auditing AI Underwriting for Fairness: What Gets Measured

Proxy discrimination does not need the protected characteristic as an input. What a defensible test measures, why the fairness definition is a governance choice, and what carriers are asked t

📚 All Insurance Insights

🔗 Explore Other Domains

🌐 General Insights → 🏦 Fintech Insights → 📌 Finance Insights → 🏥 Healthcare Insights → 📋 All Insights →